Non-Traditional Research Outputs (NTROs) are works that do not fall under the usual output categories of journal articles, books, book chapters, etc. These works may include;
Evaluating Non-Traditional Research Outputs (NTROs) involves several criteria and methods, often tailored to the specific type of output. Here are some common approaches:
Peer Review: Similar to traditional research outputs, NTROs can be evaluated by experts in the field. This is often used for creative works, performances, and exhibitions
Impact and Reach: The influence and dissemination of the NTRO are considered. This includes the reputation of the venue, gallery, or event where the work was presented, audience size, media coverage, and social media engagement
Usage Metrics: For digital outputs like datasets or software, metrics such as downloads, citations, and usage statistics are important. Platforms like Altmetric and PlumX can track these metrics
Qualitative Assessments: Detailed descriptions of the research's significance, innovation, and contribution to the field are often required. This might include the context of the work, its aims, and its impact on advancing knowledge
Documentation and Accessibility: Ensuring that NTROs are well-documented and accessible, such as through institutional repositories, can also be a factor in their evaluation
These methods help to capture the diverse nature and impact of NTROs, ensuring they are recognised alongside more traditional research outputs.
Since NTROs (Non-Traditional Research Outputs) are not usually published in conventional ways, it's crucial to ensure your work is both discoverable and accessible. Here are some steps to help you achieve that:
The Macquarie University Research Data Repository (RDR) is an institutional platform where Macquarie University researchers can publish, showcase and share research data, other NTROs like videos, artworks or unpublished reports can be added to Pure and displayed in your staff profile.
Key benefits of sharing your data in the Research Data Repository:
Here are some tools for tracking NTROs (Non-Traditional Research Outputs):
More information on these tools and other ways to track NTROs and research outputs, can be found here.
There are other indicators of research quality or academic esteem. Measures of esteem may provide additional evidence of research quality and/or research capacity, to sit alongside traditional metrics. They may be relevant for competitive grant applications and academic promotions.
It is suggested that researchers keep a record of these measures listing: activity, date, and relevance to your research. Also, Pure can be used to keep a record of esteem measures and as such be used to enhance a researcher's public profile.
Such measures include: